January 15, 2005

Dumbass phones

A year ago I got a Sony Ericsson T610 (what, you want a link? Go and search Google for yourselves, I’m too busy ranting) to replace a Siemens C35i which I had owned for years. I was pretty happy with it. I didn’t have any problems learning to use it, and initially my only gripe was that it was damn slow compared to the old phone. I didn’t let this bother me too much as I knew that it was not a problem with that particular model of phone, but just the expected consequence of cramming more and more bells, whistles and gongs onto what was once a really basic concept, namely “the telephone”.

Then I went and spent £30 on a USB cable and some software to jack it into the PC, downloaded all the photographs that I’d taken, and realised that they actually looked quite crummy. After a little experimentation I established that it was partly due to a poor resolution of about 350×280 pixels, and partly due to a very small and weak lens.

As my contract approached 12 months of age, I phoned my provider and put the squeeze on them to give me a free upgrade. They offered me the Sharp GX15. I did a little quick research, discovered that it seemed to be exactly the same phone, but with camera resolution up to 640×480. Worth a try, I thought.

So, where are we so far? I’m upgrading my phone purely on the basis that the new one may have a better camera. We’re nearly there, people.

So the new phone arrives, and I put my SIM card in it, and I charge the battery, and I realise that I forgot to copy my phone numbers from the old phone to the SIM card, so I swap the SIM back, do the copy, swap the SIM again, and copy the numbers to the new phone.

And then I put it into camera mode and press the button to take a snap.

The phone emitted a deafening synth-shutter sound, causing birds to take flight outside the window.

So I went into the menus to find out how to turn down the volume of the synth-shutter sound to a level which was less likely to result in structural damage to my office. Ideally, the same level as the subtle, though still naff, synth-shutter sound which the T610 used to use.

I can’t find this option. I can only assume that Sharp have gone all vigilante and decided to do something about the problem of people taking camera phones into showers and brothels and taking photos of those in attendance without their permission.

Management: So, this whole shower and brothel thing then. What can we do about it?

Tech: Well, the phone could make a noise that can’t be turned off by the user.

Management: Good, good. What sort of range does the camera have?

Tech: I guess you could make out a nipple at twenty metres.

Management: Right, so people who are twenty metres away have to be able to hear it too. Could the user possibly cover the speaker?

Tech: I guess they could…

Management: Right, so the sound has to be loud enough to penetrate a centimetre of bone and flesh, yet still be audible twenty metres away.

Tech: But sir, that would mean that the sound would be deafening to someone stood twelve inches away if the speaker wasn’t covered.

Management: What are you, some kinda wooly minded liberal?

Tech: No, sir. Long live Maggie Thatcher.

Management: That’s more like it.

Reader: Does Pete have a point?

Pete: Yes, I do. I mean…

Yes, I do. I didn’t take many photos with the old camera, because the quality was crap. Now that I have a phone with a better camera, I’m still not going to take many photos, because I can’t do it if anyone is in the same room for fear of them thinking that I’m one of those people who thinks it is still the mid-80s and keeps their phone (and their voice) on maximum volume, to ensure that everyone else in the vicinity knows that they have one of these fantastical new-fangled mobile cellular telephone gadgets.

That’s just not the way that I work. I’ve always been very conscious of the noise pollution caused by mobile phones and the use of them, and have always practised the utmost discretion.

Which, in this case, means not taking photos.

As a closing request, if anyone out there has a GX15 or similar Sharp model and knows how to turn down the volume of the shutter sound, obviously I’d appreciate your feedback. Comment below or click the fantastical magical “contact” link at the top of the page to email me directly. Ta.

Pete
  • Comments: 8
  • I have a camera in my palm, and despite the fact that it's 1.2MP it's photos look like shi... - Ben
  • The MC60 and T610 seem to have roughly the same maximum resolution, but you may find that ... - Pete
  • Rats! Now I'm depressed. I've just dumped my Siemens MC60 for a T610 mainly due to the woe... - ade
  • Camera phones are useful for those shots of things you want when you don't have your main ... - Adrian
  • I think you may have hit upon an idea, though. I'd pay much more for a camera-phone that m... - Vaughan
  • Comments: 1
  • Gosh, I didn't realise I was so amusing. I've been doing that for years. As you know. - Karen

Calling Thames Valley Bloggers

Have you been to see Closer yet? We will be going in the next few days to a cinema in Reading or Bracknell. Let us know via comment or contact form if you would care to join us, and we will make plans.

Karen
  • Comments: 2
  • Goodnight John-boy! - Graybo
  • Life can be good. Although it seems to be unfashionable to say so. It sounds so...Walton- ... - sue

An offer you can’t refuse

I think that Yahoo! need to update their non-JavaScript version of the mail page. Given that I have a free 250MB mailbox, how much do you reckon I would be willing to pay for another 10MB?
screenshot from Yahoo

Pete
  • Comments: 2
  • What is this shonky of which you speak? - Stuart
  • That really is quite impressively shonky. Nice to know that some things never change - and... - Lyle
January 12, 2005

Book of the Year: 2005

I have no hesitation in recommending The Woman in White by Wilkie Collins, as the best book I have read this year. Obviously it is also the only book I have read this year; nonetheless, it deserves full marks for just being a damn good read.

It’s got all the gothic mystery of Frankenstein, without actually causing nightmares; and all the period drama of Pride & Prejudice, without actually being a tedious Austen novel. It is beautifully written in the multiple-narrator style, like Wuthering Heights but less confusing. There are moments of humour, strong likeable (and dislikeable) characters, a twist that you won’t quite predict, and a resoundingly satisfying end.

It’s also only £1.50, and should be the one classic you get round to reading this year.

5/5

Karen
January 11, 2005

This Whole Film Club Thing

Hey, guys. It’s been too long, hasn’t it?
Okay, okay, steady with the questions, one at a time. I’ve been doing some seriously awesome stuff over the last 18 months or so, and it’s been a rollercoaster ride, know what I’m saying? Firstly, I went to Blackpool, where I chewed some hay and walked up and down a beach. Then I went to Brighton, where I chewed some hay and walked up and down a beach. Then I went to Skegness, where I chewed some hay and walked up and down a beach. Then I went to Portishead, where I chewed some hay, walked up and down a beach, flipped the bird at a guy on the road and got punched in the face.
I remember when I walked out on Pete, must have been a coupla years ago. Told him never to contact me for any reason, any reason whatsoever, the only exception being if he needed me to represent the face (and ears) of a totally awesome film-based project.
So here I am.
Your challenge, people, is to go and see Closer, starring some Americans. And then we’ll meet up back here, and you’ll try and convince me that it wasn’t shit, and I’ll try and convince you that it was. Send in your reviews by Monday 24th January.
And once we’ve got that out of the way, we’ll watch some fuckin’ awesome film with guns and car chases, instead of namby pambying around and pontificating about love.

Donkey
  • Comments: 9
  • Yeah, that rings a bell actually, adhoc. Prestatyn. I remember her. Fantastic woman. Nice ... - Donkey
  • Hey Donkey. Good to meet you. I look forward to joining your filmclub. I am a little appre... - adhoc
  • I do not believe Donkey to be your true name. Clearly you are Hugo Rune in thin disguise. - phil
  • Yeah, I know Mr. Ed, though these days he insists that we call him "talentless hack". Soun... - Donkey
  • Donkey! Good to see you back! I always meant to ask you - do you by any chance know Mr Ed?... - Vaughan
January 6, 2005

The Uborka! 2005 Film Club

Uborka! needs a project. Uborka! is in a post-christmas slump, and has therefore nicked its idea for a project from Lori, because Lori’s idea is good and clever.
This project will require your participation. If you read Uborka! and don’t even leave comments, please note that you are now required to join in. What do you think this is, a freeforall? And you can stop with those accusations of cliqueyness, at the back; the only reason you think this is a clique, is because YOU don’t contribute to it. Well, now you do.
Now, what we plan to do is this. Each week we decide on a film. The following week, everyone watches it. If you wish to do so, you may contribute a review by email, and we will post this on Uborka!
In this way, we will fulfill some of those vague resolutions about getting more culture, and Karen & Pete won’t have to write so much content. Huzza!
p.s. In case you weren’t already excited enough, we have managed to nab a Top Mystery Guest to present the Film Club. Old readers of Goo won’t be disappointed.

Karen
  • Comments: 16
  • If there is one thing I like, it's giving my opinion about a film! - anna
  • In for Closer but can't promise to stick to weekly. Last year the only time I managed to g... - stroppycow
  • Just what the doctor ordered to cure these cursed January blues. I'm in, even if this migh... - Daisy
  • Team America - World Police? - Mr.D.
  • Actually, me and Adrian went to the Electric last night, and they had these cool bed/couch... - Destructor