April 12, 2013

Friendly Cocktails

You will forgive me for serving cocktails with one eye closed today; I am half-asleep owing to staying up until 1am watching The Sopranos and eating pork pies, and then being woken by my child at 5. The vague idea behind bring-a-friend cocktails was to avoid any accusations of cliqueyness; while it’s lovely to reunite the old gang, there are new characters in our midst who might find it all a bit strange.

Onesuch guest, who has been persuaded (apparently after a little stiffener in the lobby) to join us, is K. K has been famous behind the scenes of Troubled Diva for a long, long time; is warmly remembered in Casa Uborka for teaching Bernard to pretend to smash an egg on his head; and has recently taken up butchery. It is therefore appropriate that he is drinking a cocktail with a human toe in it. This appears to have set a grisly and disgusting scheme for the afternoon. His friend, of course, is Original Mike, whose in-depth interview will be appearing in these hallowed pages next week: keep your eyes peeled! We are adding his Cowboy Martini to our collection of martinis, started last week by Lori. If you need to know, this is gin, sugar syrup, orange bitters and mint leaves.

The good Doctor Pockless is back this week, and we are forcing him to be friends with Lyle. To save time, I have mixed Pockers’ Monkey Brains (Baileys and peach schnapps) and Lyle’s Mind Eraser (vodka, kahlua, butterscotch schnapps and soda) in the same mixer. It couldn’t make them any worse.

In sicknote corner, we have Sevitz and Krissa. Krissa has invented a new cocktail for both of them, and we shall call it a Krissa, because we’re imaginative like that: the hot toddy with cough syrup. Delicious. For no good reason than that if they’re not in sicknote corner now, they will be soon, I have paired up Gert and Pixeldiva. Gert because she is eating out of date tinned sardines, and Pix because she’s planning a trip away, which usually presages illness. So they might as well get it over with.

I should think we will all be singing in the rain this weekend, if only because Ding Dong is such a bloody persistent earworm. Another Mike’s cocktail is another vile mix that could go in the Pockless shaker, featuring Tia Maria and amaretto. Mike’s another relative newcomer to the cocktail hour, famous for science and childminding. His assigned friend is Stuart, whose cocktail sounds delicious; I’ll be having two of those.

And to mop up, I wasn’t sure if Kate’s request was actually a cocktail, but a quick google reveals that a cleanse is really a thing, and sounds rather jolly, so I think I’ll have one of those as well, and I’ve ordered one for absentee Pete (could it be that he has work to do, or is he sulking because I ran out of bread and didn’t make him a packed lunch today).

Finally and appropriately, I’d like to raise a toast to absent friends: Asta, who is doing a Neil Kinnock today.

Karen
  • Comments: 5
  • You'll want to be strict on the two-drink limit at your happy hour. One too many Whiskeytu... - Krissa
  • It's very hard to write about the King of Bhutan when you've had your monkeys erased. - Doctor Pockless
  • You're my beshtesht mate, you are, Mishter Pocklish. - lyle
  • This Monkey Eraser isn't as bad as it sounds. Better than the Mind Brain, anyway, which is... - Doctor Pockless
  • I'll happily give it a try. Thanks! - Pete

Drinks orders now please!

It’s Friday, and that means it’s Uborka cocktails day! Place your orders in the comments below please.

This week, it’s bring a friend week. You don’t have to bring a friend, but if you don’t, then one will be appointed to you, and you’ll have to sit next to them for the rest of term. So, y’know, there’s that incentive.

Drinks will be served a little later than the usual 3pm this week.

Pete
  • Comments: 14
  • A quadruple Mind-Eraser! Exactly what I need after a week finishing off an animation about... - Doctor Pockless
  • Today's orders have me rather craving a cleanse. - Kate
  • Pix - you could have a Sam Adams Boston Lager...it's reasonably good, too, which is a plus... - Stuart
  • I quite fancy this Bloody Mary foam with salsa, and a side order of out-of-date tinned sar... - Gert
  • My "friend" has already placed his pickled toe order (and he's very welcome to it). As I'm... - original mike
April 11, 2013

Diamond

At the weekend, I found myself going on a surprise visit to Diamond. If my memory serves correctly, I first heard about this at Reading Skeptics in the Pub when Stephen Curry was doing a talk about viruses.

The Diamond Light Source is a particle accelerator, not unlike the LHC, but whereas the LHC’s purpose is to make small things go fast and smash them together and watch awesome shit happen, the Diamond’s purpose is to make incredibly small things go fast, coax them to emit little squirts of bright light, and use that bright light to examine small things in ways that could not be achieved by any other means.

As you may have guessed, when I use the word “bright”, I’m understating it somewhat. Brighter than the sun? Yep. How much brighter? Oooh, about 100 billion times brighter.

So, electrons, right? They get generated in an electron gun, which is surprisingly small, but then after all it’s only generating electrons. Not so tough. They then go into a linear accelerator, which looks a bit like this…

linac

…and cranks the little fellas up to about 100 MeV. They then enter the booster synchrotron, which is a circular track where they rattle round a few times, accelerating under the influence of shitloads of magnets until they hit top speed, about 3 GeV. Wherein they are allowed to divert into the storage ring…

storage ring (inside)

The channel in which the electrons themselves travel is incredibly narrow, as you would expect. Their trajectory is precisely maintained by more of these chunky magnets. The circuit is 562m in circumference. How many times, would you guess, do the electrons complete a full circuit per second? I know the answer. It’ll make your pants go moist.

Once these electrons are going nice and speedy, it’s time to put them to work. At 22 points along the storage ring (32 when it’s finished) there exists apparatus to encourage the electrons to emit their rich, luscious light. This is then guided down a beamline, which comes off of the storage ring at a tangent.

storage ring

The beamlines consist of three main rooms. The first contains the gear which processes the light, selecting for specific frequencies if required. Most of the work done at Diamond uses x-rays.

beamline

The second room is where the sample is placed and the experiments are run. You would not want to be in this room when your beamline is switched on.

end

And the third is where the comfy chairs and computer screens are. That’s where you sit and drink tea while science happens in the next room.

It takes a lot of dedicated, enthusiastic people, and a lot of incredibly funky equipment to manipulate our world on such a tiny level, to keep those tiny little particles spinning round at such phenomenal speeds on such a precise course so that we can continue to push our scientific understanding of the world to more and more refined echelons. Some people don’t give a shit, but they’re going to get the benefit from it anyway.

If you’re interested in visiting Diamond, here’s where you need to look.

These photos were taken with a Canon PowerShot SX260 HS and lightly massaged using the GNU Image Manipulation Program.

Pete
  • Comments: 10
  • I hide my light under a bushel of harrassed childcare and what shall we have for tea - Lisa
  • I always forget how sciencey you are, Lisa. - Karen
  • I was working at Daresbury (the prequel to Diamond) when Diamond was given the go-ahead. A... - Lisa
  • I like the bit with the tea. - Karen
  • You should! Here's the information. I will add it to the post.... - Pete

Why shouldn’t I change my name?

I enjoyed this interesting article on The F Word by Claire Rush. Names: first, last and middle, have fascinated me for as long as I can remember. Around the age of ten I fell in love with the Earthsea series, in which names are given great importance. Characters have a true name and a use-name. Knowing something or someone’s true name gives you power over them. Knowing your own true name is part of finding your identity.

Naming my son was a huge responsibility. I wanted something that would be his, a name he could own. Karen has always felt like a pale and ignorable name that I barely hear when people say it. It’s just a sound. My posh relations used to put all the emphasis on the first syllable, because they thought it sounded common otherwise. My grandfather wanted to use my middle name, Rebecca, for the same reason. No wonder I have a lukewarm relationship with my given name. My original surname lent itself well to mean nicknames.

When I accidentally got married in my early twenties, we did in jest create a fused surname, since Hilditch-Williams nicely turned into Hillbilly. In fact I could never get my mouth round Williams, I found it really hard to sign my new name, it just didn’t run off the pen. I changed all the official documents, but decided, just for me, not to change it at work. Work had other ideas, and my email was changed for me, my colleagues laughed and corrected me to my married name. I was surprised by this. The only advantage was that it was now easier to book a restaurant table over the phone.

When the marriage inevitably ended, I reverted to my original surname with indecent haste, and started to feel more warmly towards it. On remarriage, I hung on to my original surname, and again my employer changed it on my email and in other official contexts, without asking me. Personal email was more of a thing by 2000, and I hung on to my unique hotmail address for dear life. Let’s face it, I was never really into that marriage.

Pete and I are not married, but I do have his name. It was a deliberate choice, not mindless compliance with “the patriarchal traditions of marriage and relationships”. It doesn’t make me his chattel, he didn’t ask me or tell me to do it, I asked for it when we got pregnant. It’s a team name. It’s a container. It’s a statement that we’re together, all three of us. I haven’t subsumed my identity into his, in fact I’ve never felt more me. Now I’ve got my common first name and my common surname, and they fit together nicely. My signature works. I still have to spell it on the phone, but it doesn’t take as long. The fact is, my identity is partly defined by my roles, and my true name acknowledges that. This is the name under which I have achieved my best things. This is me.

Karen
  • Comments: 27
  • Fascinating I never changed my name. Three reasons. I like my last name. I was fairly... - asta
  • I know so many people who changed their names on the event of a youngish marriage, achieve... - Gert
  • Here's how it went when we met, Graybo: Pete: Hi, I'm Pete. Karen: Which Pete? Pete: Pe... - Karen
  • "Mrs Dot Nu" - and you don't have to spell that? (I always think of Pete as Pete Dot Nu - ... - graybo
  • >> "I followed up with “because that’s the easiest order to reverse if things go... - Krissa
April 10, 2013

Mixing

A feature that I believe, or hope, is present in film and television in the future, is the presentation of separate dialogue, music, and environmental audio channels, so that the end user can mix them as desired. This would have drawbacks, one of which is that the director loses the ability to control this aspect, but then arguably they don’t really have it anyway.

Discuss.

Pete
  • Comments: 7
  • [...] that politics seem to have become more important to me than art & music recently... - It’s All Ultimately Politics | Hydragenic
  • Yes. When I first read your post, I immediately associated it with the 'red button' stuff... - Stuart H
  • It sounds like you're coming at this from a perspective of remix culture. For me, it's jus... - Pete
  • I suppose unadulterated [anything] is a myth, because ultimately it's always filtered thro... - Stuart H
  • That's exactly my point. The unadulterated artist/director's vision is a myth, otherwise i... - Pete

Boobs! Out!

Uborka supports the No More Page 3 campaign, asking Dominic Mohan, editor of The Sun newspaper, to stop showing pictures of topless young women and objectifying the female body. Leilani Dowding, former page three girl, said on the Radio 4 Today Programme this morning that it was a bit silly to campaign against breasts and make people think they were disgusting and offensive, and that Page 3 girls are no more sexual than Boticelli’s Venus, because they don’t wear lots of make up. This spurious argument spectacularly missed the point, which is one illustration of why this is not a celebration of the female form, but is a disrespectful and unhelpful way of looking at women’s bodies. It is deeply rooted within our culture that breasts are for men and the people they are attached to tend to be a bit dim.

Not only does it have a negative effect on women’s and girls’ feelings about their own bodies, it presents us as second class citizens to be decorative rather than have a valuable input into society. It suggests that breasts’ primary purpose is sexual, and fosters a culture where some people are uncomfortable around breastfeeding mothers.

This message has no place in a national newspaper. Page 3 is an offensive anachronism and I urge you to sign the petition.

Karen
  • Comments: 2
  • I want to 'like' your comment on both counts. On the second count, I'm just about to book ... - Karen
  • Well said. Page 3 is just a small part of the culture of sexism and frequent blatant misog... - another mike

No Hablo Diablo

I recall when I was a naive student, first learning that our university had a Hellenic society. I thought that the student union was very bold to endorse something so edgy as devil worship.

Pete
April 9, 2013

Where Are They Now? An interview with LondonMark

Are you living in the same place as in 2004/05?

No, I have moved six times since 2004, and while one of those moves was transatlantic, two other moves were within the same apartment building, so I have experienced both extremes.

Would we recognise you if we passed you in the street?

Yes, although age has slightly withered me and custom may well have made stale my actually-quite-finite variety. My height has neither lengthened nor shortened, my weight has definitely heightened, and other relevant dimensions have decayed at what experts assure me is the appropriate rate.

What do you think is the best/most important new technology/online thingy to have appeared in recent years?

I’m not sure I can single out a particular technology out of so many in the past 7 years, but I think that what I find important is the ubiquity of technology in everyday life: the always-connected universal device (phone or tablet) that each person carries around and that links them to everything, everywhere, is still something amazing to me, even if I mostly take it for granted.

We all had a blog back then. Do you still have one, or are you mainly present somewhere else?

I stopped blogging some years back but I recently dipped my little toe in the tumblr waters to test the temperature. Otherwise, I am a sporadic tweeterer, instagrammater, and recently I even placed a drinks order in the comments of some long-lost, faraway blog.

What achievement of the last 7 years would you most like to celebrate here?

Let me see: I moved to America, got married, went back to university, became a US citizen, and recently had a son. So, I’m going to go with … staying friends in the human-physical-world-real-space with many, or most, if not all, of the extended blog family from back in the day.

Who would you like us to interview next, and what shall we ask them?

I would like you to rake the Diva of Troubledness across the coals and interrogate him about his prolific output and style. Or, as I prefer to think of it, how he write good and much.

Mike, if you’re willing and able, let us know and I’ll email you.
Karen
  • Comments: 4
  • I've always admired his statistical elephants. Those number-wrangling pachyderms are the s... - Pete
  • I have always admired his sartorial elegance. - Karen
  • As one of those friends in the physical-world-real-space (well okay he didn't say he'd gon... - Krissa
  • I am both willing and able. Shoot! - the original mike