April 11, 2013

Diamond

At the weekend, I found myself going on a surprise visit to Diamond. If my memory serves correctly, I first heard about this at Reading Skeptics in the Pub when Stephen Curry was doing a talk about viruses.

The Diamond Light Source is a particle accelerator, not unlike the LHC, but whereas the LHC’s purpose is to make small things go fast and smash them together and watch awesome shit happen, the Diamond’s purpose is to make incredibly small things go fast, coax them to emit little squirts of bright light, and use that bright light to examine small things in ways that could not be achieved by any other means.

As you may have guessed, when I use the word “bright”, I’m understating it somewhat. Brighter than the sun? Yep. How much brighter? Oooh, about 100 billion times brighter.

So, electrons, right? They get generated in an electron gun, which is surprisingly small, but then after all it’s only generating electrons. Not so tough. They then go into a linear accelerator, which looks a bit like this…

linac

…and cranks the little fellas up to about 100 MeV. They then enter the booster synchrotron, which is a circular track where they rattle round a few times, accelerating under the influence of shitloads of magnets until they hit top speed, about 3 GeV. Wherein they are allowed to divert into the storage ring…

storage ring (inside)

The channel in which the electrons themselves travel is incredibly narrow, as you would expect. Their trajectory is precisely maintained by more of these chunky magnets. The circuit is 562m in circumference. How many times, would you guess, do the electrons complete a full circuit per second? I know the answer. It’ll make your pants go moist.

Once these electrons are going nice and speedy, it’s time to put them to work. At 22 points along the storage ring (32 when it’s finished) there exists apparatus to encourage the electrons to emit their rich, luscious light. This is then guided down a beamline, which comes off of the storage ring at a tangent.

storage ring

The beamlines consist of three main rooms. The first contains the gear which processes the light, selecting for specific frequencies if required. Most of the work done at Diamond uses x-rays.

beamline

The second room is where the sample is placed and the experiments are run. You would not want to be in this room when your beamline is switched on.

end

And the third is where the comfy chairs and computer screens are. That’s where you sit and drink tea while science happens in the next room.

It takes a lot of dedicated, enthusiastic people, and a lot of incredibly funky equipment to manipulate our world on such a tiny level, to keep those tiny little particles spinning round at such phenomenal speeds on such a precise course so that we can continue to push our scientific understanding of the world to more and more refined echelons. Some people don’t give a shit, but they’re going to get the benefit from it anyway.

If you’re interested in visiting Diamond, here’s where you need to look.

These photos were taken with a Canon PowerShot SX260 HS and lightly massaged using the GNU Image Manipulation Program.

Pete
  • Comments: 10
  • I hide my light under a bushel of harrassed childcare and what shall we have for tea - Lisa
  • I always forget how sciencey you are, Lisa. - Karen
  • I was working at Daresbury (the prequel to Diamond) when Diamond was given the go-ahead. A... - Lisa
  • I like the bit with the tea. - Karen
  • You should! Here's the information. I will add it to the post.... - Pete

Why shouldn’t I change my name?

I enjoyed this interesting article on The F Word by Claire Rush. Names: first, last and middle, have fascinated me for as long as I can remember. Around the age of ten I fell in love with the Earthsea series, in which names are given great importance. Characters have a true name and a use-name. Knowing something or someone’s true name gives you power over them. Knowing your own true name is part of finding your identity.

Naming my son was a huge responsibility. I wanted something that would be his, a name he could own. Karen has always felt like a pale and ignorable name that I barely hear when people say it. It’s just a sound. My posh relations used to put all the emphasis on the first syllable, because they thought it sounded common otherwise. My grandfather wanted to use my middle name, Rebecca, for the same reason. No wonder I have a lukewarm relationship with my given name. My original surname lent itself well to mean nicknames.

When I accidentally got married in my early twenties, we did in jest create a fused surname, since Hilditch-Williams nicely turned into Hillbilly. In fact I could never get my mouth round Williams, I found it really hard to sign my new name, it just didn’t run off the pen. I changed all the official documents, but decided, just for me, not to change it at work. Work had other ideas, and my email was changed for me, my colleagues laughed and corrected me to my married name. I was surprised by this. The only advantage was that it was now easier to book a restaurant table over the phone.

When the marriage inevitably ended, I reverted to my original surname with indecent haste, and started to feel more warmly towards it. On remarriage, I hung on to my original surname, and again my employer changed it on my email and in other official contexts, without asking me. Personal email was more of a thing by 2000, and I hung on to my unique hotmail address for dear life. Let’s face it, I was never really into that marriage.

Pete and I are not married, but I do have his name. It was a deliberate choice, not mindless compliance with “the patriarchal traditions of marriage and relationships”. It doesn’t make me his chattel, he didn’t ask me or tell me to do it, I asked for it when we got pregnant. It’s a team name. It’s a container. It’s a statement that we’re together, all three of us. I haven’t subsumed my identity into his, in fact I’ve never felt more me. Now I’ve got my common first name and my common surname, and they fit together nicely. My signature works. I still have to spell it on the phone, but it doesn’t take as long. The fact is, my identity is partly defined by my roles, and my true name acknowledges that. This is the name under which I have achieved my best things. This is me.

Karen
  • Comments: 27
  • Fascinating I never changed my name. Three reasons. I like my last name. I was fairly... - asta
  • I know so many people who changed their names on the event of a youngish marriage, achieve... - Gert
  • Here's how it went when we met, Graybo: Pete: Hi, I'm Pete. Karen: Which Pete? Pete: Pe... - Karen
  • "Mrs Dot Nu" - and you don't have to spell that? (I always think of Pete as Pete Dot Nu - ... - graybo
  • >> "I followed up with “because that’s the easiest order to reverse if things go... - Krissa
April 10, 2013

Mixing

A feature that I believe, or hope, is present in film and television in the future, is the presentation of separate dialogue, music, and environmental audio channels, so that the end user can mix them as desired. This would have drawbacks, one of which is that the director loses the ability to control this aspect, but then arguably they don’t really have it anyway.

Discuss.

Pete
  • Comments: 7
  • [...] that politics seem to have become more important to me than art & music recently... - It’s All Ultimately Politics | Hydragenic
  • Yes. When I first read your post, I immediately associated it with the 'red button' stuff... - Stuart H
  • It sounds like you're coming at this from a perspective of remix culture. For me, it's jus... - Pete
  • I suppose unadulterated [anything] is a myth, because ultimately it's always filtered thro... - Stuart H
  • That's exactly my point. The unadulterated artist/director's vision is a myth, otherwise i... - Pete

Boobs! Out!

Uborka supports the No More Page 3 campaign, asking Dominic Mohan, editor of The Sun newspaper, to stop showing pictures of topless young women and objectifying the female body. Leilani Dowding, former page three girl, said on the Radio 4 Today Programme this morning that it was a bit silly to campaign against breasts and make people think they were disgusting and offensive, and that Page 3 girls are no more sexual than Boticelli’s Venus, because they don’t wear lots of make up. This spurious argument spectacularly missed the point, which is one illustration of why this is not a celebration of the female form, but is a disrespectful and unhelpful way of looking at women’s bodies. It is deeply rooted within our culture that breasts are for men and the people they are attached to tend to be a bit dim.

Not only does it have a negative effect on women’s and girls’ feelings about their own bodies, it presents us as second class citizens to be decorative rather than have a valuable input into society. It suggests that breasts’ primary purpose is sexual, and fosters a culture where some people are uncomfortable around breastfeeding mothers.

This message has no place in a national newspaper. Page 3 is an offensive anachronism and I urge you to sign the petition.

Karen
  • Comments: 2
  • I want to 'like' your comment on both counts. On the second count, I'm just about to book ... - Karen
  • Well said. Page 3 is just a small part of the culture of sexism and frequent blatant misog... - another mike

No Hablo Diablo

I recall when I was a naive student, first learning that our university had a Hellenic society. I thought that the student union was very bold to endorse something so edgy as devil worship.

Pete
April 9, 2013

Where Are They Now? An interview with LondonMark

Are you living in the same place as in 2004/05?

No, I have moved six times since 2004, and while one of those moves was transatlantic, two other moves were within the same apartment building, so I have experienced both extremes.

Would we recognise you if we passed you in the street?

Yes, although age has slightly withered me and custom may well have made stale my actually-quite-finite variety. My height has neither lengthened nor shortened, my weight has definitely heightened, and other relevant dimensions have decayed at what experts assure me is the appropriate rate.

What do you think is the best/most important new technology/online thingy to have appeared in recent years?

I’m not sure I can single out a particular technology out of so many in the past 7 years, but I think that what I find important is the ubiquity of technology in everyday life: the always-connected universal device (phone or tablet) that each person carries around and that links them to everything, everywhere, is still something amazing to me, even if I mostly take it for granted.

We all had a blog back then. Do you still have one, or are you mainly present somewhere else?

I stopped blogging some years back but I recently dipped my little toe in the tumblr waters to test the temperature. Otherwise, I am a sporadic tweeterer, instagrammater, and recently I even placed a drinks order in the comments of some long-lost, faraway blog.

What achievement of the last 7 years would you most like to celebrate here?

Let me see: I moved to America, got married, went back to university, became a US citizen, and recently had a son. So, I’m going to go with … staying friends in the human-physical-world-real-space with many, or most, if not all, of the extended blog family from back in the day.

Who would you like us to interview next, and what shall we ask them?

I would like you to rake the Diva of Troubledness across the coals and interrogate him about his prolific output and style. Or, as I prefer to think of it, how he write good and much.

Mike, if you’re willing and able, let us know and I’ll email you.
Karen
  • Comments: 4
  • I've always admired his statistical elephants. Those number-wrangling pachyderms are the s... - Pete
  • I have always admired his sartorial elegance. - Karen
  • As one of those friends in the physical-world-real-space (well okay he didn't say he'd gon... - Krissa
  • I am both willing and able. Shoot! - the original mike
April 8, 2013

The Mother’s Manifesto

Here are the underlying values of my manifesto as Shadow Secretary ((I just think “shadow secretary” is a really cool title)) for Families:

  • To recognise that families come in many formats;
  • To value and support parenting;
  • To value the childless and the older generations, and acknowledge that they have a place in the social family;
  • To recognise that investment in younger generations is investment in the future;
  • To develop evidence-based policy supporting the social family framework.

Sex & Relationships

School curricula and wider social learning will educate children to be able to make informed decisions about sex and relationships, including a broad understanding of different sexualities and gender identities. Family planning will be widely and openly available. By being respectful of children, we will teach them to respect themselves, to question authority, and to say no. We will abide by the UN Convention on the Rights of Children.

The Family

We will work to de-medicalise pregnancy and childbirth, provide state-subsidised insurance for midwives, and take low risk birth out of hospital settings. Midwife-led birth centres will be financed through savings on unnecessary interventions in birth and the complications thereof.

In the postnatal period, where the need is identified, daily visits will be made by a postnatal care assistant or doula; referrals will include isolated families with no local grandparents as well as young families, single mothers, and those recovering from a difficult birth. The cost of this will be covered by savings on treating postnatal depression and longer duration of breastfeeding leading to lower incidence of hospitalisation for mothers and babies. We will work with the Department of Health to provide effective breastfeeding support for every mother, and to ban advertisement of infant formula.

Working Families

This department will facilitate informal childcare, and proposes a top-up to basic social security payments where unemployed or retired family members provide childcare. We will support current arrangements for part time or flexible working, longer maternity and paternity leave, and sabbaticals for parents, recognising that parenthood grows people.

Helping Each Other

Mothers on maternity leave are encouraged to link up with newer parents or with isolated or elderly people, to provide support and company; and the active retired and the unemployed will be encouraged to provide similar support to the isolated or elderly and new families. Other social voluntary work will be rewarded with a top up to basic social security, or with opportunities for social training and development, which in many cases will lead to qualifications and a step back into work or towards a career change.

The Department for Families proposes the development of the Social Family Framework, bringing back the village and creating opportunities for everyone to be nice to each other.

Karen
  • Comments: 19
  • You probably should, if it's a British beach. - Karen
  • These sound like excellent drinks. Can I have a parasol in mine? - graybo
  • Also, I wonder what is said by the fact that I had to check the spelling of "fallible" and... - graybo
  • Oh I'm so sorry for the sucked egg remark, that was just rude. Humble Pie on the Beach? - Karen
  • Excellent. We should reward ourselves with a cocktail. Can I get you a Sucked Egg? - graybo
April 7, 2013

Which Egg? Thorntons Chunky Dark

Thick, thick chocolate

Thick, thick chocolate

Some chocolate was eaten on Easter Sunday; it would have been impossible to make much of a dent in it. We watched Game of Thrones and Dr Who to the glorious accompaniment of Pina Colada and Thornton’s Chunky Dark easter egg. This egg wastes no time on the usual paltry handful of inner chocolates, it’s pure egg. Externally, it has a weird matt finish that makes it look unfoodlike. It could not be broken with a thump, but had to be bashed repeatedly with the TV remote control before its rich dark surface could be breached.

As you can see from Fig.1, the eggshell is extremely thick, and the chocolate is so rich that two people were unable to eat more than half of it between them over the course of one evening. We consider this to be a personal failure.

Karen
  • Comments: 1
  • This egg also gave us a chance to review the robustness of LG remote controls. The outcome... - Pete