October 21, 2004

What Not To Watch

My apologies if all this has been said already, but I have never seen the programme before. It was on while I was in the gym last night, and I watched it from the safety of my cross-trainer, with an increasing feeling of discomfort which was not attributable to the exercise I was undertaking.
I saw two thin, pointy women going round with a video camera, taping people bitching about their friend and colleague, a woman who was deemed to be too unfeminine ever to attract a man.
In retribution for this unspeakable crime, the pointy women played her the tape and asked her if she agreed that she was too unfeminine ever to attract a man. She looked quite justifiably hurt, but politely refrained from mentioning that she was already pretty damn comfortable in her clothes, and didn’t need two pointy bitches to tell her where she was going wrong.
What a bloody awful premise. I didn’t watch any more of it, but I imagine that they all went on a jolly trip to Top Shop and bought some unsuitable skimpy outfit, dyed her hair and plastered her in makeup, in an attempt to make her more comfortable with her own body. Then I imagine she was required to face all the friends who had said she was ugly and didn’t know how to dress, and claim to be over the moon that her self-image, self-respect, and identity, had just been shattered on national TV.
I know what would be a good idea for a reality show: find some kids who are being bullied at school, and follow them around with a camera watching people pick on them. The audience can then phone in with more bitchy remarks and undermining comments, and the prize shall be a piece of rope strong enough to hang oneself from the nearest coat hook.

Karen
  • Comments: 9
  • There is worse - try "The Swan" on Living TV. Take two slim, pretty young women with insec... - Daisy
  • Didn't one of their "victims" call one of them a spychotic bint after hse had her knickers... - stroppycow
  • Surely it can only be a matter of time before BBC3 broadcasts WHAT NOT TO WEAR UNCUT LATE ... - Vaughan
  • I'm always disturbed by the way they grope the victim and tell them what wonderful tits th... - D
  • I walked into my friends lounge last night and said: "What's this?" "Trinny & Tranny." I t... - Destructor
October 20, 2004

Smell Tickets, but can’t see them

If you absolutely must order gig tickets from See Tickets, then you should be aware of the following things:
1. They will only deliver to the registered address for the cardholder. For security reasons, apparently.
2. They want a signature on delivery.
3. There is a system in place for people who don’t sit at home all day watching daytime TV, but getting through to them is a pain. Email is a complete waste of time. The published telephone numbers get you to a message that says “All of our lines are busy. Please call back later.” If you find the secret number, then you have a 15 minute wait in a queue, which is marginally better.
4. However, they are very prompt at debiting your account the relevant amount.
In summary, don’t deal with them unless there is no other way of getting the tickets you want. And be aware of the points above.
Now, does anyone know how I go about reporting companies to the Department of Trade and Industry for their appalling customer service?
I will leave you with an excerpt from their website:

It’s this attitude that makes us different – we’re passionate about events – and getting you to the ones that you want to see. We also care about great service and treating people as individuals.
We want the first name people think of when they want to go to a live event to be See. We are continually working on delivering the best service from enthusiastic, bright people, and extending the breadth of our product so you will be able to get tickets for anything you want from us.

I find this hilarious.

Pete
  • Comments: 11
  • If anything is going to shove me into conservatism, it's the TVL (after that: council tax)... - Destructor
  • I'm in favour of the TV licence. I think it's a great idea. *cough* - Vaughan
  • I suspect the TV license model is not sustainable long term. But the market conditions wil... - Adrian
  • The Official Uborka Position is that we are not in favour of a TV License around here. - Karen
  • Actually most Brits I find are in favour of the TV license. Although we had a similar thin... - Adrian
October 19, 2004

The Uborka Cut-out And Keep Collection: Marketing Calls To Your Mobile

If you receive a phone call from an unknown number on your mobile, and you don’t recognise it, try reciting the following:
“I am sorry for interrupting you, but before you continue I felt that I should make it clear to you that I do not recognise your number, and subsequently I am unable to verify your identity. For reasons of security, I am therefore unwilling to answer any of your questions or provide any personal information whatsoever. If you represent a company with whom I have an existing contract, then please send your query to me through the mail, using the address which you have for me in your database, so that I may verify the authenticity of your request. I apologise for any offence that this may cause. Whether you come under this category or not, please update my communication preferences in your database to indicate that I do not wish to be contacted on this telephone number without prior arrangement.”
Consider this to be version 0.1 of this document. If anybody has any suggestions for how it can be improved, then please put them in the comments box, and I’ll incorporate them into the final version.
And perhaps we could even have an alternative, hyper-offensive version for those people who really like to make themselves unpopular.
In case you are wondering if I actually used the above speech at some point today, I have to say that I didn’t. What actually happened was the following:

Continue reading

Pete
  • Comments: 6
  • I let unknown numbers ring to voice mail when "working from home" but in the office since ... - Adrian
  • Oooh, yes, that's a nasty trick. I'd never phone back a number if I didn't recognise it (u... - Pete
  • How's this for a scam? An automated dialler calls your phone at a wierd hour. You don't an... - Destructor
  • Yes, Gordon, I was intending to waste a little more of their time than that. And also to e... - Pete
  • "Fuck off and die" - too much? - Gordon

The Christ on a Bike Restaurant Rating Scale

  1. Service – Friendliness, communication skills, waiting time.
  2. User interface – can you work out how to order/find your way around the restaurant or the menu.
  3. Accuracy of order – did you get what you asked for?
  4. Niceness of food
  5. Toilets
  6. Value for money
  7. Drinks – quality, variety, price.
  8. Décor and ambience
  9. Miscellaneous – hot flannels, mints with the bill, and other unexpected niceness
  10. Gout [absence of] – the mood of the persons involved in the meal experience, and other influencing factors. This to be referred to as giving them the benefit of the gout.
  11. Choice – diversity and interestingness of menu.
  12. Location – i.e. not in Slough.

This rating scale was developed over the weekend by the Uborka-Pockless Restaurant Rating Committee, on a field trip to Bristol. It was calibrated and tweaked over the course of a 48-hour eating spree, which included paninis, curry, pizza, full english breakfast, and a lot of beer.

The scale is named, not in an attempt to offend any god-botherers or alienate Sevitz, but after one of the exclamations uttered during the hour-long wait for our main courses on Saturday night.

The twelve criteria represent the twelve disciples, although we haven’t got round to giving them actual names yet, mainly because we don’t know the names of all the disciples. This is just random and irreverent, and that’s the way it’s going to stay.

The scale is a closed-option marking system, where the venue scores either a YES or a NO against each criterion. The number of YESes are added up, and that gives a final rating. If you feel particularly geeky, you can then turn this into a percentage, but that would be a bit much, don’t you think?

The original version of the scale was developed in the Kathmandu Nepalese Restaurant in Bristol, which scored a shockingly low 6/12 Christs on a Bike, or Christ on a Bikes if you prefer.

We still had plenty of time while we were waiting for our bill, so we went on to test the scale by assessing the nice little cafe where we had delicious paninis at lunchtime. The place was the Boston Tea Party, and the score was 9/12 Christ on a Bikes.

On Sunday we had the opportunity to evaluate the Full English provided by our charming bed and breakfast. We were obliged to award 12 Christ on a Bikes, which I have just decided to call a Jesus. It really was that good.

Finally, in the spirit of indulgence that characterised our weekend [but please bear in mind that we went on a four-hour walk on Saturday and a three-hour walk on Sunday], we had pizzas in the Bar Room Bar, where Pete was delighted to revisit the Crispy Duck Pizza, and they scored 8.17/12 Christ on a Bikes before visiting the toilets, and 9/12 Christ on a Bikes afterwards.

As an interesting aside, we discovered that when in the process of waiting for an unacceptable amount of time in a Nepalese restaurant, the most effective way of conjuring up more attentive service is to complain to the waiter and then get out your notebook and start making comprehensive notes about the restaurant.

Karen
  • Comments: 2
  • Or the wine waiter saying rather too loudly and in tones of obvious disapproval, "A half b... - Simon
  • Ah, but did you get a waiter standing behind you sighing audibly at customers who have had... - Lyle
October 16, 2004

Industrious Windustrious Spider

spider

If only we were all as dedicated as this terrifying little fucker. Maybe that would make the world a better place?

Pete
  • Comments: 1
  • Apparently, such dedication has been highlighted in several televisual productions made fo... - Simon
October 15, 2004

Speech!

In celebratory anticipation of The Wedding of Graybo and Hels on Saturday, and The Wedding of Stuart and krissa on Monday, today’s cocktails are Wedding Cocktails.
Unfortunately no girls have shown up, and I did so think that girls loved weddings. The hats, you know, and the excuses for buying nice clothes. And the men in suits.
Okay, I’ll stop with the sweeping generalisations.
As always, Mr. D is drinking vodka. He’s never been known to drink anything else. It hardly seems appropriate to toast anyone’s nuptials with vodka, but when did we start being conventional, anyway?
Sevitz, the King of Sleaze and lately wannabe-assistant to Trinny and Susanna, is drowning his sorrows with a Snowball, possibly the most disgusting drink known to mankind. And I’ve tried Unicum.
It’s a rare delight to see Doctor Pockless stick his head above the parapet, and I’m only sorry that it’s five o’clock, not eleven thirty. Cheers.
I did look to see if there was a cocktail called a Benny Hill for Vaughan, but there isn’t. Surprise.
So, um, congratulations to the four of you. Please make sure that you each marry the right partner.
Update
Anna showed up, but she was late. That makes her technically the bride.

Karen
  • Comments: 7
  • There are just too many vile mental images involved in this theme. Sorry I missed the drin... - Lyle
  • When you say "Mike came into a bottle of unicum"... - Mr.D.
  • I remember in my first year at University, Mike came into a bottle of unicum - I think per... - Pete
  • Please don't. Nor to my birthday party. I'll stick to whiskey. - Adrian
  • The best possible Unicum based cocktail would be to put the unicum in the glass, then empt... - Karen
  • Comments: 3
  • i would like a champagne fountain, bubbling away in the background. Won't drink it, mind, ... - anna
  • Can I please have such a large Smirnoff Blue that I won't be able to Morning Dress myself ... - Mr.D.
  • I'll have a snowball please. As in "chance in hell". That's of finding a women to marry me... - Adrian
October 14, 2004

A Pain in the Right Eye

Out celebrating the new job last night. We tried out the tapas bar, as a contender for New Favourite Restaurant; and five good dishes, bread, and a bottle of sangre de toro for about £30 makes it a strong candidate. Tapas, obviously, shares many characteristics with sushi, in that it features lots of little dishes instead of one big one. Crucially, though, none of them tasted of seaweed, and the absence of a conveyor belt made us more inclined to linger.

Towards the end of the albondigas, my brain decided it was time for its four-yearly migraine. It chose the outline of the map of Spain from the window behind Pete’s head, and etched it on to the retina of my right eye, where it glowed like a wasp trapped in a fluorescent light bulb.

The lights gradually slid into a central position, preventing me from looking at anything directly. I bravely continued to converse with Pete, regarding him from the corner of my eye. If I hadn’t told him what was happening, he would probably have thought this was nothing unusual.

Eventually, Spain morphed into Portugal, and then slipped into the Atlantic Ocean. Once the lights are gone, the headache starts, and I want only to lie down in darkness; so we went to play the quiz machine in the pub. Please don’t assume that Pete made me do this against my will; I was keen to try distraction as a headache cure, but we lost £3 on the hangman, and my head still hurt. I had to be taken home and put to bed by 8.30, and today my head is full of cotton wool.

Karen
  • Comments: 10
  • Dear Ms Karen and M. Pete, I'm studying at the Imperial Palace of Smirnoff for a degree in... - Mr.D.
  • "A new wife chaser"? Good grief, that sounds like something out of Benny Hill. - Vaughan
  • Sorry, haven't got time to read anything. Just dropped by long enough to say "Mine's a pin... - Doctor Pockless
  • I think we need new job drinks today. If I can have a new wife chaser, that'll be great. - Graybo
  • I'm getting a migraine now.. too many formulas.. Congrats on the job! - Gordon