April 3, 2013

Family Easter

I met Pete shortly before Easter in 2003. We fell head over heels in love, as you know, and wanted to spend every minute of every day with each other, despite living 2 hours’ drive apart. We immediately implemented plans to spend every weekend together, with the notable exception of Easter that year. I was a little surprised; in my family Easter isn’t really celebrated unless we happen to be together in which case we might give each other last-minute-bought cheap chocolate. My Great Aunt doesn’t even send religious cards to us anymore. The following weekend, Pete referred to some stupidly expensive present he had been given for Easter. Presents for Easter, I thought. How odd.

Easter 2005

Easter 2005

Fast forward: Easter 2004. I am invited to join the clan at a swanky hotel in Ipswich, overlooking the marina. I make sure to buy my cheap chocolate in plenty of time. All seems like a fairly normal weekend away, until after breakfast on Easter Sunday, when I am sent up to the in-laws’ room where “nests” have been laid out for each of us. These are filled with chocolate eggs, small yellow chicks, and gifts. Quite serious gifts, but check out Easter 2005, by which time I was really part of the family.

I’ve always been slightly nonplussed by how seriously Pete’s Polish-extracted family take Easter.

As Pete and his sister became more independent, and the size of the family increased, it felt necessary for all of us to contribute more. Up to this point, Pete’s mother had insisted that Easter was her thing, and she didn’t want us to give her presents or chocolate, but she did not get her way, and the nests got bigger and bigger. The sheer quantity of chocolate was such that we would still be eating it in August. And on the arrival of Bernard, we had all his to eat as well. It was just too much.

Easter 2008

Easter 2008

Last year, worried that it was getting a bit expensive for everyone, I suggested a sort of Secret Santa arrangement, which was hastily renamed the Eggsellent Easter Exchange, a name that I notice was not used at all this year. Pete wrote a little programme that randomly allocates each of us one person to buy for, and emailed them the news. One of us also gets to ‘help’ Bernard buy someone a present. We set a spending limit, and everyone gets very excited about all the secrecy. I think we’ve found that we put more thought into what we’re buying for our one person. The nests seem to be piled higher than ever with chocolate, and more of it is Belgian, but the presents feel that much more special. Pete and I still end up eating the majority of Bernard’s chocolate.

Our family Easter also includes an Easter egg hunt around the house (yay, more chocolate!), a roast dinner, and a failed intention of going for a walk. There’s no spiritual or religious element whatsoever, but it’s a really important family festival and we’d sooner miss out Christmas. The bonus there, of course, is that we have to share our Christmases with the other branches of the family, whereas none of my extended family is remotely interested in Easter. Result!

Easter 2013

Easter 2013

 

Karen
  • Comments: 3
  • Always indoors, as far as I'm aware. Though my grandfather used to hide them in a real (de... - Karen
  • I'm curious about your egg hunt- indoors or outside? Because of Canadian weather, ours w... - asta
  • I'm wondering if watching touring cars all day is also going to become a permanent traditi... - Pete

Drowning in kernels

I’m not a total computer eejit, so the fact that I have just been caught out for a second time by this little “issue” means that something clearly needs to be done.

The bit of a Linux distribution that is technically the “Linux” is the kernel. This is a fairly small chunk of code, about 50MB, that is the first thing to load up. Once this is started, all the other services then tie into it. You know how whenever you update almost anything in Windows, you need to restart your computer? Well, in Linux, you only need to do that if you have updated your kernel. If anything else updates, it is not necessary to restart the whole computer. This is very neat, but has one flaw.

When the kernel is updated, what it actually does is download the new kernel alongside the active one. When you restart, it then restarts with the new one. All the old kernels are retained. I know I said that they are 50MB each, but when you include some additional paraphenalia, it comes to about 250MB per update.

This morning, Bernard reported that the computer wouldn’t start. This is the HTPC that I assembled 18 months ago. I did some investigation and found that the system partition was full. A few minutes later, I’d freed up 3GB by deleting the obsolete kernels and everything was peachy again.

This issue wouldn’t normally be a problem for anyone who just uses one big partition for everything. Or who reinstalls every 6 months. Or who actively keeps an eye on their list of kernels. This is why the developers generally don’t care about fixing it – the response is always, without exception, “just remove them manually”. But I am sure there are thousands like me who don’t fit any of those 3 criteria. This isn’t actually an issue with the Linux kernel itself – it’s an issue with how the developers of the distribution have used the package manager to keep the kernel up-to-date, but in a naive way that doesn’t cater to the fact that the number can grow unchecked. I expect that Xubuntu inherits it from Ubuntu, and Ubuntu in turn inherited it from Debian. Perhaps it even goes back further than that.

The reason why this whole thing is a tad ironic is that one of the reasons I deride Windows is that you need to spend so much time maintaining it just to keep it running. I guess no-one’s perfect.

Pete
  • Comments: 4
  • Original Mike (like the new moniker, btw), of course his bum's a bit saggy, I had to take ... - Karen
  • He's certainly looking a bit washed out. - Stuart
  • I hate to point this out, but his bottom looks like a bad collagen job. - the original mike
  • He's just resting. - Pete

Name The Baby!

Yesterday afternoon we got back from being away, to find that our new baby had been delivered. I use the term delivered with great care, since in my professional world we say, haughtily, that babies are not delivered, they are born. But this one was definitely delivered, in the post. Pete quipped as I cut open the packet and pulled it out by the legs that it was clearly breech. ((Coming out arse-first)) This is not a joke he could or would have made back in the old days.

Bernard heard our remarks about the new baby and bimbled through to the kitchen to ask if we were having a baby. A playmate at last! he was thinking. I quickly disappointed him by explaining that it was a new teaching doll, used to demonstrate good positions to hold a baby to breastfeed. My previous doll was at least ten years old, rather grubby from living in the boot of the car, and the arm kept coming off, which really didn’t help me to instill confidence in handling one’s baby, in the parents-to-be.

2013-04-01 12.20.05

The old baby [left] was named Stuart after two members of the old cocktail crowd, and also because it was one of Bernard’s shortlisted names. Introducing him to an antenatal class as Stuart always raised a smile. What shall we name the new baby?

Karen
  • Comments: 31
  • Or Cameron, which is *apparently* gender neutral these days. These wacky modern parents. - Lisa
  • Hilary. Obv. - Lisa
  • Well, Adolf was a perfectly reasonable name until 70 years ago too. - Pete
  • I was always slightly confused that Shakespeare foolishly used Ariel for a male character. - Karen
  • Gotta feel sorry for the 374 boys named after the little mermaid. - Pete
April 1, 2013

Why have we returned, when we were doing such a good job of staying away?

But, really, were we, really?

Uborka started in July 2003 as a Movable Type installation on erzsebel.com, which was Karen’s vanity domain at the time. Originally named “Into The Wild” and then rechristened “Uborka”, we eventually migrated it to uborka.nu in September 2003. Early posts are archived but are somewhat marooned, as on April 2004 I accidentally deleted the database and did not have a backup. Fortunately, because of the way that MT generated pages and served them as static HTML, the viewable content was not lost, and can still be seen to this day (between https://uborka.nu/ubi/000004.html and https://uborka.nu/ubi/000625.html).

On 11 October 2005 we pulled the shutters down on Uborka for an indefinite hiatus, but soon afterwards we restarted our own individual blogs and went back to sporadically posting on them, where we felt free to post as often or infrequently as we liked. These then gradually dwindled down to nothing, and Twitter took over. Bloody Twitter.

There used to be a oft-repeated shibboleth “I’m blogging this.” Granted, it was an annoying turn of phrase at the time, but it hindsight it was full of promise. What it would mean was “I intend to write a blog post about this event. I may not get round to starting it. I may abandon it half way through. If I do complete it, it may be about this event, or it may go off onto a tangent and be about something else entirely. But what matters is that I’m inspired by what I am witnessing here.” What do we have now? We have Twitter, for the tl;dr generation. Blogs in bitesize. To me, “I’m tweeting this” means “Let’s see if I can boil this experience down to 140 characters without utterly destroying its appeal.” It’s evident that some people take well to this form of constrained writing, and produce some superb moinsgrossbyte nuggets. But for me, I find myself too-often frustrated by the fact that I don’t have the freedom to yibber and yabber and bimble and bumble and waffle and weffle.

So here we are. The period between our decision to relaunch Uborka, and last Friday (which by now is probably cemented in your memories as one of the great highlights of 2013), was about two weeks. I discovered two things early on in that interval. Firstly, that allowing two weeks was overly generous, as I managed to get most of the required technical tasks done in the first two days, and have been twiddling my thumbs ever since. Secondly, that Uborka was a much more short-lived phenomenon than I recalled. Here’s a graph of my entire life, and boy it’s a doozy.

My Life

The green section represents Uborka. The blue section represents my main personal weblog. Other obscure/private weblogs are not included. This chart was not what I expected to see, and given how the end of Uborka coincided with the beginning of Bernard, it’s a startling reminder of how brief that pre-Bernard period of our relationship was ((And yes, it’s true that she forced me into becoming a dad because her biological clock was ticking, and I’ve resented her for it ever since. As soon as he reaches 18, I’m outta here to hook up with some floozy who is half my age.)). I was expecting to see a decent-sized blue chunk at the start (my blogging pre-Uborka), a meaty green wedge (the good old days, ah them, yes you’re right there with me aren’t you) and then a pathetic blue dribble. And if memorableness linearly correlated with elapsed time, then that’s how it would be.

And this proves my point which I announced right back at the start of the post, but then pretended to have forgotten about. Does it make any sense to say “we’re back” when, as far as I can deduce, we haven’t really been far from here all this time?

Incidentally, it’s been a fun couple of weeks getting the old templates and tricks across from Movable Type to WordPress, and if you find anything questionable then drop me a line. I’m aware of the fact that on mobile phones the search box obscures the masthead image – I’ll see what I can do about that.

Pete
  • Comments: 13
  • I claimed 10 years from the start of my first blog in 2011, but failed to have such an awe... - Karen
  • And there was me thinking that you restarted the blog because you were so inspired by my "... - Lori Smith
  • Well, it's true that I've been struggling with inspiration lately. - Pete
  • Are you suggesting we immediately hiate? - Karen
  • From what you say, Vaughan, it seems the one thing the internet is lacking at the moment i... - Stuart
March 29, 2013

A toast: death to the death of blogging

Welcome back, welcome back. As you might have noticed, we’ve spent the last couple of weeks dusting down the furniture and refitting a few bits and pieces; I may have mentioned it once or twice on the twitters, but I think I got away with it. And what better way to welcome everyone back, and of course to make a fuss of any newcomers, than to throw a cocktail party?

The last time I did this, I don’t think I had the benefit of wikipedia to help me navigate my way around your more obscure requests. It feels somewhat like cheating, or cheapening our efforts (“Start with wikipedia,” said Mr Grey, in that godawful book, thus ensuring that no self-respecting researcher would ever start there again).

As well as being a redcarpet launch party, this is of course a celebration of various anniversaries, including nine years for Stuart and Krissa, and ten (I think) for Anna and Bobbie. And indeed twas ten years ago to this very equinox that Pete took me out for a pizza and never let me go. That weekend we discovered that it was no use crying over spilt red wine, that a spider down your cleavage really breaks the ice, and that we had a surprising amount of stuff in common. Over the ensuing years we have laughed [hysterically, for example, at Ross Noble’s muslim women’s marching band], cried [especially when deprived of sufficient sleep, also sometimes because of wearing unsuitable shoes], and had a baby [see previous remark about sleep]. The baby is now six and a half years old and has just asked us what uborka means. Our lives have changed beyond all recognition, in brilliant ways that would never have happened without each other; I’ll take another few decades of this, please.

So I would like to make a toast to Pete, the love of my life, the rock steady bassline of this family, your handsome host this death-defying easter afternoon: to Pete, and death to the death of blogging. He’s drinking a large Caol Ila, and then probably another.

You may also have noticed the cute little drink-serving bot, @ubotka, specially adapted to carry a tray of cocktails without spilling it, as well as keep you informed of new posts and particularly amusing comments over there on the twitters. Since the bot has no gender, we will be using neutral pronouns for hum, which will become deeply confusing after a while. On hus tray at the moment, hu is carrying an Old Fashioned for the always glamorous Lori, a Purple Rain for the always gardening Graybo, and a Tequila Sunrise for the always gordon Gordon. More on the letter g will follow in a later post, but just to get you in the mood, our Gert has apparently ordered large quantities of goo.

We are delighted to have Vaughan at the party, celebrating with ribena and junior disprin, a combination known to the parents present as Calpol on the Beach; and the charmingly confused krissa, who is having a Manhattan, of course. And yes, who is that strange Englishman in your apartment? Could you pass him this scotch?

A couple of orders came in on twitter, which really, people, is not how it’s done; but as it’s been a while we’ll put them through this once. It is with great pompousness and circumscription that I announce the presence of Dr Pockless himself, and for the good doctor, Ubotka has an espresso with a Mars Bar slipped into it, as requested. And who is this? It’s merialc, and she’s getting married this year, and loads of us are going to get pissed at her wedding and dance like loons, oh yes. I recommend she start early with a Piña Colada. Mike in particular has expressed great excitement at the idea of a Real Bloggers’ Disco, but right now he’s tucked up with a Hot Toddy. Does K know about this?

Some of you may recognise Astaa, who has been around forever, but never ordered a cocktail before: Welcome to the dark side, and here is your Wallflower. This reminds me to remind you that next week it will be bring-a-friend cocktails; we’d hate to be accused of being cliquey.

Meanwhile, last Friday Lyle actually did ask us when we were going to start writing uborka again. Imagine our little innocent faces. He almost won this bucket of mojito. And for Mark, the multi-talented little ubotka has baked an entire tray of fondant fancies, which he can share with the missus but they might not be suitable for the wee ‘un. Are we going to need an uborka creche? Make a note, Pete. Oh and the g&ts are for Mark, long-lost ‘stee and sevitz.

Finally, fittingly, champagne-swilling Kate points out that we all seem to look a lot older. We do, we do. But so graciously and gloriously older.

Cheers.

Karen
  • Comments: 19
  • Ah, there was, but it turns out that the new security protocols were ineffective, and some... - Karen
  • I heard there was cake here. - asta
  • Are you offering to be the DJ, graybo? - Karen
  • This blog definitely needs some music. Also, I might post something on grayblog, just to... - graybo
  • Ha. Yes. Not that sort 'nother one. - Karen

Anyone for cocktails?

On hearing about the death of google reader, Pete, piqueful, once again resigned from blogging.

Pete has resigned from blogging a number of times over the years, usually when he didn’t receive a satisfactory number of comments on one of his posts. This despite his oft-repeated claim that he was only writing for himself anyway.

My sorry role each time has been to drag him back to the coalface and insist that he write. WRITE, DAMN YOU, I would cry. YOU ARE AND ALWAYS WILL BE FUNNY FUNNY PETE DOT NU.

The death of google reader was the final straw. I actually had to go and get a pram for him to throw his toys out of. Later I gave it back to the child, without the toys. This was not our own child, who is now six and does not have a pram, despite having many many toys.

Patiently, I explained to him the following equation:

RSS = death of blogging;

Death of google reader = death of death of blogging.

We’re back.

Karen
  • Comments: 22
  • This makes me happier than I can say. A Hendricks and tonic for me, please, and I drink ... - estee
  • Do we look older, or is that just my sobriety goggles? Champagne, please. - Kate
  • I think that a very large gin and tonic would be lovely for me, a French 75 for the missus... - Mark
  • Goodness. Congratulations, hosts, and I'll have the only appropriate drink for right after... - Stuart
  • This is exciting. I only ever watched the cocktail parties from afar, so I'm requesting a ... - asta
  • Comments: 3
  • * stands back * "Yes, it has a certain... flair?" And you should be punch-pleased! (p.s. a... - Mr.D.
  • Daddy is pleased as punch. - Pete
  • Daddy looks frowny. Cheer up, daddy! - mike